Résumé en anglais
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the birth of the democratic Republics of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania the countries have consciously and subconsciously been eradicating the built reminders of their Soviet history. This has occasionally led to the mindless destruction of functional monumental edifices associated with Soviet legacy and resulted in the worship of everything new and innovative, such as glass and steel shopping malls and high rise office blocks symbolic of theconsumerist nature of modern western democracies. The making of the cultural heritage for these newly independent countries is tightly tied to the largely failing integration policies in whereby young second generation Russians, even after 26 years of independence, still don’t identify themselves as citizens of the Republics and resulting problems andconflicts are common. In this paper we examine the correlation between democracies’ want and need to exemplify themselves as a beacon of free thought, speech and will with the requirement of heritage institutions operating within these democracies to preserve not just those sites deemed worthy according to current social thinking butalso their moral duty to preserve sites created by all socio-economic models. We will compare and contrast the on-going discourse about achieving perceived democratic idealswithin these countries through the production of new heritage with relevant data, information and case
studies from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.