Votre ressource mondiale sur le patrimoine
EN
ES
FR
Notice (permalien)
Réf.
42819
Type
conference item
Titre
Examining the decision making community in Government of India's HRIDAY (Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana) scheme
Langues
English
Auteurs
Patel, Purvi / Tayal, Shobhit
Lieu de publication
Charenton-le-Pont
Pays de publication
France
Maison d'édition
ICOMOS
Date
2018
Titre de conférence
ICOMOS 19th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium "Heritage and Democracy"
Lieu de conférence
New Delhi, India
Date de conférence
13-14th December 2017
Mots-clés
development / participation / urban growth / cultural heritage / conservation / town and country planning / conservation of architecture / management / economic aspects / social aspects / sustainable development / conservation projects / governmental organizations / communities / stakeholders / projects
Pays mentionnés
India
Résumé en anglais
In the context of Government Schemes such as HRIDAY, Decision-making regarding Urban Development is inherent to the success of the aims and objectives of the scheme. However, contrary to
the stipulated author of a development process, it is stretched and distorted in many ways by the decisionmakers and stakeholders throughout.
Strain put on the Scheme/ project’s aims by relationship between various agencies, absence of role clarity,and ad-hoc decisions have affected and in part defeated the very concept with which HRIDAY (Heritage
City Augmentation and Development Yojana) scheme was conceived by the Ministry of UrbanDevelopment, Government of India.
This paper aims to assess the roles played by the author/s of the process, the Project Management Unit, aswell as Heritage City Anchor the agency providing the concepts, along with other agencies such as local
authority, and community involved in implementing the HRIDAY projects in India by looking at thedecisions made or unmade by various stakeholders in 2 out of 12 cities. Contrary to the excellent process
envisaged by the government, this review from the perspective of a stakeholder agency trying to designand implement the initiatives brings forth the many challenges as experienced by those in the middle and
on ground. Aim is to reveal the actual process and the opportunities converted and lost in conserving,preserving, and in general integrating the heritage of those places into urban planning and development
process.In case of HRIDAY, when practically everyone is doing such projects for the first time, the huge gap
between elite and often isolated experts and the actual machinery delivering the work has made a majorimpact on the projects, and will keep affecting the ultimate goals of defining, conserving, inventing and
sustaining heritage in cities.
the stipulated author of a development process, it is stretched and distorted in many ways by the decisionmakers and stakeholders throughout.
Strain put on the Scheme/ project’s aims by relationship between various agencies, absence of role clarity,and ad-hoc decisions have affected and in part defeated the very concept with which HRIDAY (Heritage
City Augmentation and Development Yojana) scheme was conceived by the Ministry of UrbanDevelopment, Government of India.
This paper aims to assess the roles played by the author/s of the process, the Project Management Unit, aswell as Heritage City Anchor the agency providing the concepts, along with other agencies such as local
authority, and community involved in implementing the HRIDAY projects in India by looking at thedecisions made or unmade by various stakeholders in 2 out of 12 cities. Contrary to the excellent process
envisaged by the government, this review from the perspective of a stakeholder agency trying to designand implement the initiatives brings forth the many challenges as experienced by those in the middle and
on ground. Aim is to reveal the actual process and the opportunities converted and lost in conserving,preserving, and in general integrating the heritage of those places into urban planning and development
process.In case of HRIDAY, when practically everyone is doing such projects for the first time, the huge gap
between elite and often isolated experts and the actual machinery delivering the work has made a majorimpact on the projects, and will keep affecting the ultimate goals of defining, conserving, inventing and
sustaining heritage in cities.
Ressource intégrale
yes
Document joint
36._ICOA_1103_Patel_SM.pdfLicence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike (BY-NC-SA)
Siège de l'ICOMOS - 11 rue du Séminaire de Conflans
94220 Charenton-le-Pont, France
Tel. +33 (0) 1 41 94 17 59
E-mail : secretariat@icomos.org
Pour toute demande presse & média, contacter : communication@icomos.org
