Publicomos

Notice (permalien)

Réf.

43010

Type

article

Titre

Which is more effective: General rules or specific decisions? Some remarks prompted by the Swedish heritage legislation

Langues

English

Auteurs

Adlercreutz, Thomas

Maison d'édition

SPA Press

Date

2017

Pages

p. 69-75

Titre de la revue

Shared Global Experiences for Protection of Built Heritage

ISBN

9788192798141

Mots-clés

historic buildings / theory of conservation / legislation / archaeological heritage / archaeological remains / legal protection / national legislation / methodology / churches / categories / criteria / regulations / religious heritage

Pays mentionnés

Sweden

Résumé en anglais

This essay is about legal technique. It is more efficient to regulate protection of the cultural heritage by issuing more or less detailed decisions, or is it sufficient to issue rules in general wording? The choice of technique is not devoid of importance. With general rues the effect can be made much far-reaching, but the interpretation may be more contentious. Individual decisions demand much office work, but may in consultation with parties concerned result in good implementation. Some pros and cons are discussed here, illustrated by the Swedish heritage legislation, where general rules have a long standing.

Ressource intégrale

yes

Document joint

Adlercreutz%202015.pdf

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (BY-NC-ND)