Votre ressource mondiale sur le patrimoine
EN
ES
FR
Réf.
41874
Type
conference item
Titre
Cultural shifting-sands : changing meanings of Zimbabwe sites in Zimbabwe, South-Africa and Botswana
Langues
English
Auteurs
Sinamai, Ashton
Date
2003
Pages
3 p.
Titre de conférence
14th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: ‘Place, memory, meaning: preserving intangible values in monuments and sites’
Lieu de conférence
Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe
Date de conférence
27 – 31 oct 2003
Mots-clés
historic sites / conservation / intangible heritage / conservation of historic sites / management
Pays mentionnés
Botswana / South Africa
Monuments et sites
Dzata, South Africa / Bomboshaba, Botswana / Great Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe / Manyanga, Zimbabwe
N° Patrimoine mondial
364
Résumé en anglais
Heritage managers have for long failed to recognise the intangible aspects of immovable cultural heritage. With new developments in archaeology’s expanding disciplines, which have largely been influenced by fourth world politics, many can now identify the intangible values of sites. Heritage managers continue, however, to face problems in the management of sites because of the failure to understand the simultaneous existence of different systems of value overlaying their official meaning. They have also failed to identify the origins of these attachments to a site and why there are constant clashes between other numerous competing values. This paper will examine sites in South Africa (Dzata), Botswana (Domboshaba) and Zimbabwe (Great Zimbabwe and Manyanga) to show that the ‘intangibility’ of a site is in constant movement, as it compromises with other competing values. It will show through the study of these sites that “intangibility” is simply a manifestation of power within a cultural landscape. Power is made visible to the common man or to the state through values that are ascribed to cultural heritage sites. This power may be used to control change within communities, or to effect change within that same community or nation. Thus, for traditional authorities, it is easier to control the community if the religious values of the site are intact, and for the state it might be easier if a site is made to represent the nation in new ways. Managing heritage sites like those mentioned above thus requires an understanding of the origins of values attached to these sites by different sections of the community/nations. This paper will use the aforementioned sites to prove that when one examines the ascription of values to these sites as manifestations of power, managing them becomes easier.
Document joint
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (BY-NC-ND)